- Who GETS power? Why?
- Who WANTS power? Why?
- WHO DESERVES power? Why?
I asked you to take notes on the discussion and to substantiate claims with evidence. The three classes had quite different discussions, but ultimately arrived at some conclusions about power sharing and the perils inherent in establishing order in a group. Some classes got farther than others, connecting ideas in the book to their understanding of democracies, authoritarian regimes, oligarchies and republican (not the party) forms of government. Review your notes from today. Add to them. Jot a comment to this blog post, if so moved. Your insights are fantastic.
Each class investigated Piggy, Ralph and Jack's competencies, shortcomings, and challenges, and each class got around to talking about what the following items symbolize in a larger consideration of exercising power within a society:
- conch - rule of law, authority. Note that it has (through sound) the ability to call everyone together, but it can also be broken--it is fragile.
- fire--power. When controlled, it can be life-sustaining; when uncontrolled, it is a destructive force.
- glasses--Tekne, insight. Remember your studies of Greek history? This helpful tool is critical in establishing the infrastructure everyone relies on, and is a reflection of Piggy's intuitive understanding of what needs to be done (count the children, use the conch, recognize dangers, ask for names...).
- knife--militarism, violence, criminal element. Note that Jack is the one who carries the knife, who almost kills the pig, and who wants lots of rules so he may punish those who break them.
- little 'uns --society at large as well as its weaker members. Those in power are not only morally responsible for caring for them, they must do so effectively to maintain power.
There were a wide variety of questions that came up during the class:
- Why doesn't Jack kill the pig?
- What makes a person or a group "civilized?"
- Why are Piggy's suggestions dismissed, ignored, or criticized?
- What are deciding factors in the battle between civility and savagery? Are we predisposed toward one?
- What do our observations from today tell us about the nature of power?
After our discussion, I asked you to take a look at the three initial quotes again: in an ideal world, what would the answers to these be?
Tomorrow, we'll be heading back into Macbeth. Tomorrow and Friday, we'll be looking at a video performance of Act III.
HOMEWORK
Post FOUR important quotations and TWO literary terms on the appropriate pages on the wikispace. Be sure to study the literary terms closely. The majority of you need some review on those!
Are these supposed to be from Macbeth or Lord of the Flies?
ReplyDeleteI would like to point out an error. Under the comments link it said "1 comments" please note the extra s when there is in fact only one comment, given that mine was the second. hahah
ReplyDelete-lilly dinosaur
This comment has been removed by the author.
ReplyDelete"knife--militarism, violence, criminal element. Note that Jack carries the knife, is the one who almost kills the pig, and who wants lots of rules so he may punish those who break them."
ReplyDeleteI agree with the fact that Jack what? carries the knife
Jack what? is the one who almost kills the pig
But if the phrase "who wants lots of rules" is supposed to be connected to the subject, it shouldn't start with who. If the phrase that starts with "who wans lots of rules" is supposed to be like "He who wants cake and who wants ice cream" that works too, but then there should be an "and" in between "knife" and "is." I have not phrased this very well, but if you read it over, you might see where I'm coming from. It just sounds awkward to me.
rephrasing "Note that Jack carries the knife, is the one who almost kills the pig, and wants lots of rules so he may punish those who break them."
Or "Note that Jack carries the knife and is the one who almost kills the pig and who wants lots of rules so he may punish those who break them."
There is a typo in Michael Short's correction. He is missing the letter 't' in the word 'want'. (with "who wan[t]s lots of rules" is supposed to be like)
ReplyDelete-Shelby Sinclair
I think you are all hilarious (as well as quite observant and helpful).
ReplyDeletesleep with one eye open, Shelby...
ReplyDelete